1 / 3 2025:CGHC:7409-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1014 of 2023 Suman Shrivastava S/o Late Jamak Lal Shrivastava Aged About 54 Years Resident Of Shyam Nagar, Tilda, Nevra, Behind Paikra Clinic, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Secretary Department Of Revenue, State Of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Secretary General Administration Division Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN 2 / 3 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 06/02/2025 1. Present petition has filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 10.02.2015 (Annexure P/2), whereby the claim for family pension has been rejected on the basis of Rule 47 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1976. The petitioner has filed the present petition with the following reliefs: “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to declare Ultra-virus fixing of maximum age limit of 25 years for providing family pension under rule 47 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Pension) Rules 1976 in respect of unmarried daughter, in the interest of justice. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the State government to made relevant amendment, in rule 47 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Pension) Rules 1976 regarding entitlement of family pension to unmarried, unemployed daughters State Government employees beyond 25 years, in the interest of justice. (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the official letter dated 10.02.2015 (Annexure P-2) in the interest of justice. (iv) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 3. The prayer made by counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the 3 / 3 State counsel. 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ved