IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRL.M P.No.1064 of 2012 and CRL.M.P.No.1065 of 2012 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2057 OF 2009 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to setting aside the Judgment dated 05.10.2009 passed in CrI.A.no. 65/2008 on the file of the court of IV Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa against the Judgment and Decree Dated. 11/06/2007 in GC No.131/2005 in the I Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate Kadapa. Between: Pandipati Rajesh, Son of Subrahmanyamsetti, aged about 30 years. Residing at Bandlaveedhi,Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner / Respondent No.1 / Accused No.1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravathi, through SHQ., Mahila P.S., Kadapa. ...Respondent / Complainant ^ LA. NO: 10F 2012fCRLRCMP. NO: 1064 OF 2012) Between: 1. Pandipati Rajesh, Son of Subrahmanyamsetti, aged about 30 years, Residing at Bandlaveedhi.Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ... Petitioner / Accused 2. Pandipati Nagamani, Wife of Pandipati Rajesh, Aged about years, residing at 17/29 Madava veedhi, Kadapa ...De-facto Complainant AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravathi, through SHiG)., Mahila P.S., Kadapa. ...Respondent Petition under Section 320 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to compound the offence under section 498 (A) of IPC and acquit the petitioner / A1. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(CRLRCMP. NO: 1065 OF 2012) Between: 1. Pandipati Rajesh, Son of Subrahmanyamsetti, aged about 30 years Residing at Bandlaveedhi,Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner / Accused 2. Pandipati Nagamani, Wife of Pandipati Rajesh, Aged residing at 17/29 Madava veedhi, Kadapa about years, ...De-facto Complainant AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravathi, through SHO,, Mahila P.S., Kadapa. ...Respondent Petition under Section 320 Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to compound the offence and acquit petitioner of the charges under Section 498-A IPC by setting aside the judgment and decree in Crl.A.No.65 of 2008 dated 05.10.2010 Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: passed on the file of the Court of IV APHC010351922009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO Crl.M.P.No.1064 of 2012 and Grl.lVI.P.No.1065 of 2012 In/And CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 2057/2009 Between: Panclipati Rajesh, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P Rep By Pp Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: ...RESPONDENT CrLIVl.P.No.1064 of 2012: Crl.M.P.No.1064 of 2012 was filed containing the signatures of the petitioner and defacto complainant by name Pandipati Nagamani requesting 2 Dr.YLR, J ; Crl.R.C.IMo.2057 of 2009 ( ^ Dated: 01.05.2025 and acquit to compound the offence punishable the petitioner/accused. under Section 498-A of l.p.c. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Public Prosecutor. In the petition, it petitioner/accused and learned Assistant 3. was averred that at the intervention of the family elders and community elders, an amicable settlement was arrived at in between the petitioner and defacto a consent decree of divorce and they are living separately withopt interfering in the personal lives of one and another. 4. As per the settlement arrived at in between the parties, this defacto complainant and the petitioner. The complainant got received petition was filed. 5. For the reasons mentioned i permitting the defacto complainant to in the petition, this petition is allowed compromise with the petitioner. .Crl.M.P.No.1065 of 2019 Crl.M.P.No.1065 of 2012 the petitioner for the charges under Section filed accompanying with statement in Crl.M.P.No.1064 of 2012 was filed to compound the offence and acquit 498-A of l.p.c. This petition is an affidavit of the defacto cornpl^riaritreiterating her 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.2057 of 2009 Dated: 01.05.2025 of the fact that the petitioner and defacto complainant got divorce and living separately, this petition is also deserved to be allowed. 3. Accordingly, this Cr!.M.P.No.1064 of 2012 is allowed. 2. In view Crl R.C.No.2057 of 2009 This Criminal Revision Case was filed challenging the concurrent conviction for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C. I 2. As per the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.1064 of 2012, the petitioner and defacto complainant are permitted to compromise the case and the defacto complainant was permitted to compromise the case and the defacto complainant was permitted to compound the offence as per Section 326 of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ 3. in view of the fact that the petitioner and defacto complainant are living separately by obtaining decree of divorce and the defacto complainant filed a petition to compromise and compound the offence with the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case can be disposed. 4. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. The Judgments passed in Crl.A.No.65 of 2008 on the file of the learned IV Additional Sessions the file of the 1 Additional Judicial Judge, Kadapa and C.C.No.131 of 2005 on Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa are hereby set aside. Consequently, the 4 Dr.YLR, J Cr!.R.C.IMo.2057of2009* Dated: 01.05.2025 petitioner/accused is acquitted under Section 320(8) of the Cr.P.C. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Sd/-K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The %^irtibH^rSessio Kadapa.(with '' 2. TheTAdditifenaUadicial First Class Magistrate records) 3. The Station House Officer, Mahila P.S. 4. The Superintendent, District Jail, Kadapa. 5. One CC to Sri. P. Ravi Shahker, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 7. The Section Officer. Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi. 8. Three CD Copies records) Kadapa. (with Kadapa. [OUT] Pradesh at PR Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 eP ORDER I 08 SEP® Sj -kW CRL.M.P.No.1064 of 2012 and CRL.IVI.P.No.1065 of 2012 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2057 OF 2nng ALLOWING THE CRL.M.P.No.1064 of 2012 and CRL.M.P.No.1065 of 2012 And CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2057 OF 2009