Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RA-CR-87-2025 (O&M) in CR-1803-2019 111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR-87-2025 (O&M) in CR-1803-2019 Date of decision:11.07.2025
Anil Sharma ..Petitioner Versus Sumita Sharma and another ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral)
1. Through this review application, the review applicant prays for review of the order passed on 08.04.2025. This Court has upheld the order of the Family Court directing the petitioner to pay maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.13,000/- per month for the wife and the child. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C, the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.4,000/- each to the wife and child. He further submits that the divorce petition filed by respondent no.1 has already been allowed. It is evident that the maintenance pendente lite fixed by the court under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is applicable only during the pendency of the proceedings. Moreover, it is well settled that the amount of maintenance ordered in various other proceedings is required to be REKHA SIHAG 2025.07.16 01:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
RA-CR-87-2025 (O&M) in CR-1803-2019 adjusted. In the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the court has directed the petitioner to pay Rs.13,000/- per month. Any payment made in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C shall be required to be adjusted. Hence, the application is
disposed of.
2. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 11.07.2025
JUDGE rekha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No REKHA SIHAG 2025.07.16 01:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh