IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10269 of 2025 ====================================================== Prabhash Chandar Thakur, S/o Late Subhash Chandra Thakur, Resident of 417, Village and PS Barhar Kothi, Bishunpur, Bishanpur Deorhi, District Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through The Collector Purnia. 2. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Purnia. 3. The Additional Collector cum District Magistrate, Purnia. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnia. 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dhamdaha, Purnia. 6. The Circle Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnia. 7. The Sub Registrar, Registration Office, Dhamdaha, Purnia. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanat Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel (12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 03-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2.The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of a writ of Certiorari for setting aside the order if any to include the petitioner's land appertaining to khata no. 16 khesra no. 1428 area 65 decimal Mouza Sukhsena thana no. 171 Circle Dhamdaha, District Purnia in Online Ceiling list in khata no. 343 and consequently in the Patna High Court CWJC No.10269 of 2025(2) dt.03-07-2025 2/3 Restriction Register (Rock Suchi) of the Registration Office, Dhamdaha, Purnia and for issuance of writ of Mandamus for directing and commanding the authorities for releasing the said land from the ceiling list and consequently from restriction register and further for any other writ(s) / direction(s) / order(s) as your Lordship may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case stated hereinafter. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite approaching the Collector, Purnea (Annexure-7 series) on 18.02.2025, no step has been taken forcing him to approach this Court. 4. Learned State Counsel submits that the respondents shall ensure that the representation is taken to its logical conclusion. He further submits that the said representation is bereft of any document to support his case. 5. Considering the limited prayer of the petitioner that he is not being heard despite representing before all the concerned, it would be appropriate that he prefers a fresh petition alongwith all the relevant documents before the Patna High Court CWJC No.10269 of 2025(2) dt.03-07-2025 3/3 Collector, Purnea in next four weeks who shall be duty bound to take the same to its logical conclusion within a period of four months from the date, the representation is preferred after hearing all the necessary parties. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U