Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5641 (MAD)

C.Vinayagmurthy v. The Commissioner

WP(MD)/30376/2025 · 2026-04-01

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.30376 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR Writ Petition(MD)No.30376 of 2025 C.Vinayagmurthy .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, Dindigul City Municipal Corporation, Dindigul. 2.Syed Rabludeen 3.S.Syed Mohamood Altaf ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to take action against the 3rd respondent herein for illegally running a slaughter house at shop No.9C Madurai Main Road, Begambur, Dindigul by considering the petitioners representation dated 24.07.2025 in accordance with law within a time limit as stipulated by this court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.30376 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.J.Lawrance Standing Counsel for R1 Mr.S.Balaji for R3 ORDER The petitioner claims to be the owner of the property bearing Door Nos. 9A to 9E, situated on Madurai Main Road, Begambur, Dindigul District, wherein five shops are located. The petitioner states that he had leased out one of the shops to the second respondent for running a mobile phone and accessories business. However, it is alleged that the second respondent, in violation of the terms of the lease, has sublet the premises to the third respondent. It is further alleged that the third respondent is running a slaughterhouse in the said premises without obtaining the requisite licence or permission from the competent authority. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation to the first respondent seeking appropriate action against the third respondent. 2.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that the petitioner’s representation would be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. 3.The said submission is placed on record. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.30376 of 2025 4.In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24.07.2025, on its own merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 2 and 3, and pass appropriate orders. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 01.04.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes skn HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. skn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.30376 of 2025 Writ Petition(MD)No.30376 of 2025 01.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis