Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56409 (KAR)

SRI. H R RAVICHANDRA v. SMT. GOWRAMMA

WP/9939/2024 · 2025-07-29

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29027 WP No. 9939 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 9939 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. H.R.RAVICHANDRA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE RAJASHEKAR REDDY, NO. 748, 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJADITHYA SADASIVAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O B.N.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 2. SRI. PRABHAKAR S/O B.N.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESPONDENTS RESIDING AT 1ST CROSS, PATEL LAYOUT, BEGUR VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560 068. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29027 WP No. 9939 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.Rajadithya Sadasivan., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decisions is taken about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, he shall not file a review petition nor seek modification or recalling of the same. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18