SRI RAMESH C v. MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WP/24938/2025 · 2025-11-18
K S Hemalekha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56406 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56406 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47572 WP No. 24938 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.24938 OF 2025 (LA-UDA)
BETWEEN:
SRI RAMESH .C S/O LATE CHAMUNDAYYA .H AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O NO. #11, PANCHAYATI HALL ROAD, A.K. COLONY, KYATAMARANAHALLI. MYSORE-570019.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI YATNAL PARASAPPA GURAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570005 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2.
THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMIBAI ROAD,
MYSORE-570005.
3.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570005.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO TAKE AN ACTION ON APPLICATION DATED 25.02.2025 HEREBY PRODUCED AS ANENXURE-D1 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND GRANT OF SITE FOR ALTERNATIVE AS PER SCHEME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION.
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47572 WP No. 24938 of 2025
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to take action on the petitioner’s application dated 25.02.2025 at Annexure-D1 and to grant an alternative site in accordance with the applicable scheme.
2. Learned counsel for respondents files a memo enclosing the allotment letter dated 18.05.1990 issued in favour of the petitioner pursuant to the resolution dated 01.04.1987 and submits that in view of the said allotment already made, the present Writ Petition is not maintainable.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition and submits that a memo to that effect will be filed during the course of the day.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47572 WP No. 24938 of 2025
4. In light of the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn without granting any liberty.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CKL/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45