Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56406 (CHH)

DURGESHWAR PRASAD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/769/2025 · 2025-11-02

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:53515-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 769 of 2025 Durgeshwar Prasad S/o Shri Maniram Aged About 46 Years Working As Teacher (English Subject) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Tamora Block, Gunderdehi, Distt. - Balod Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. District Education Officer Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh 3. Block Education Officer Block Gunderdehi District Balod Chhattisgarh 4. Khemlata Joshi W/o Pramod Kurre Aged About 47 Years Posted As Teacher In Government Middle School Tamora, Gunderdehi District Balod Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 03/11/2025 1. Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Dy. G.A. for the State. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.11.04 10:10:57 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this appeal praying for following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this writ appeal and to set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/ State has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the appeal, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the appeal/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti