- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25926 WP No. 20206 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20206 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANJINAMMA, W/O LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO. 87, PALEKAMMANAGAR CHIKKAJALA POST JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 562157 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K H.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA RERPESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY M S BUILDING BENGALURU 01 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU 560 002 3. THE TAHASILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 64 …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25926 WP No. 20206 of 2025 (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - A) CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS.B) ISSUE AN ORDER, DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 06/05/2025 PASSED BY 3RD RESPONDENT MADE IN NO.LND/JALA/CR/369/2023-2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, REJECTING THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER FOR CHANGE OF KATHA AND RECORDS OF RIGHTS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 06.05.2025 (Annexure 'A') passed by respondent No.3. 2. Sri Somashekhara K H, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has invited the attention of the Court to the order dated 10.02.2025 in WP No.928/2025 (Annexure 'P') to the writ petition and submitted that this Court has directed the respondent No.3 to take decision in the matter wherein positive direction has been issued to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25926 WP No. 20206 of 2025 respondent No.3. Therefore, he prays that the impugned order passed is to be interfered with in this writ petition. 3. Learned AGA submitted that the claim made by the petitioner herein seeking katha has been rejected by respondent No.3 and as such the petitioner has to approach respondent No.2 under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 4. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on careful examination of paragraph 11 in WP No.928/2025 makes it clear that this Court has directed respondent No.3 to strictly adhere to the procedural requirements in Sections 128 and 129 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and in that view of the matter, the impugned order has been passed by respondent No.3. Therefore, I find force in the submission made by the learned AGA that the petitioner has to challenge the impugned order before the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25926 WP No. 20206 of 2025 respondent No.2 in a manner known to law. With this observation the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41