Veeranki Mangayamma, v. Prl.Secy., Revenue dept., State of A.P.,
WP/7661/2018 · 2025-11-23
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56403 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56403 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010170122018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.7661 OF 2018 Between: Veeranki Mangayamma, W/o.Veeranki Soma Raju, Aged about 58 years, R/o Taduvai village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari district. ...Petitioner
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Thullulru Mandal Amaravathi, Guntur District, and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.V.Ganesh Bhujanga Rao Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Assignment
G.P. for Social Welfare
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“ … … declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in issuing the Pattadar pass books, Title deeds and also D-Form Patta in favour of third parties who are not the beneficiaries of the Bhoodhan Gramdhan Act and also violated Under Section 14(1) of Act, 13 of the Bhoodhan, Gramdhan Act is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 to sanction the benefits issued by the 6th respondents in favour of the petitioner while treating him as legitimate beneficiary of the
2
originally allotted land to an extent of Ac.0.95 in Sy.No.99 situated at Taduwai Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari District. …”
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner while furnishing the copies of the orders in Writ Petition No.33980 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.34076 of 2018, dated 20.9.2018, states that the present writ petition can as well be disposed of, by passing similar order. 3. Mr.K.Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader, however, placed a copy of the written instructions dated 18.11.2025 received from the respondent No.4 for perusal of this Court, wherein it is, inter alia stated that an extent of Acs.5.70 cents has been acquired for the purpose of house-sites vide Award No.3/2018-19/R&R, dated
01.6.2018. It is also mentioned that the petitioner herein along with others filed Writ Petition No.11406 of 2025 seeking a direction to the respondents therein to conduct enquiry and restore the subject land to the petitioner. Be that as it may. 4.
In view of the pendency Writ Petition No.11406, this Court deems it not necessary to further examine the present writ petition and, accordingly, the same is closed. The closure of the writ petition, however, would not preclude the writ petitioner to raise all the contentions/issues in the pending Writ Petition No.11406 of 2025. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J November 24, 2025 vasu