Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212/11
CWP-15304-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.04.2025 Pooja
…Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. K.S. Godara, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana ***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner has joined service, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous.
2.
Dismissed as infructuous.
3.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 04.04.2025 Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.04 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.