OIP-28-30 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE (Intellectual Property Rights Division) IPDATM/101/2023 SUBHASH CHAND BANSAL (ORA/189/11/TM/KOL) VS KHADIM HOLDINGS PVT LIMITED AND ANR IPDATM/102/2023 SUBHASH CHAND BANSAL (ORA/190/11/TM/KOL) VS KHADIM HOLDINGS PVT LIMITED AND ANR IPDATM/103/2023 SUBHASH CHAND BANSAL (ORA/191/2011/TM/OL) VS KHADIM HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Before: The Hon’ble Justice RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date: 10th February 2025 Appearance: Mr. Avirup Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Rishov Das, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Guchait, Adv. …for petitioner. Ms. Antara Dey, Adv. …for respondent no. 1 The Court: It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that they are not using the impugned mark ‘Khazana’ and do not intend to use the same in the near future. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that the registration in favour of the respondents of the impugned mark has expired. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties there are no contentious issues which remain to be adjudicated. In view of the above, IPDATM/101/2023, IPDATM/102/2023, IPDATM/103/2023 stands allowed. (RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) SK.