Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56399 (AP)

M. Reddappa v. Dr. Manmohan Singh

CC/1328/2018 · 2025-11-04

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010419222018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1328/2018 Between: 1. M. REDDAPPA, S/O. MUGILAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDENT OF GANDARAJUPALLE VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. M.PAPANNA, S/O. MUGILAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. M.SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. MUGILAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 4. G. GURAMMA, W/O. GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 5. G. KALAVATHAMMA, W/O. VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 6. S. ROSHAN SAHEB, S/O. SAHEB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 7. K. TAGYACHARY, S/O. KESHAVA CHARY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 8. K. NARASAMMA, W/O. K. GURAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 9. G.SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 10. J. VIDYASAGAR, S/O. JAYARAM NAIDU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 11. M. CHENNAPAPA, W/O. PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 12. M. TIPPANNA, S/O. BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 13. B. TIPPAKKA, W/O. MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2 HDR,J C.C.No.1328 of 2018 14. M. SASIKALA, W/O. CHENNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 15. A.CHINNA REDDAPPA, S/O. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 16. A. CHANDRAMMA, W/O. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 17. T.PADMAMMA, W/O. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 18. M.GANGAPPA, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 19. M.CHINNAPPA, S/O. GATTU VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 20. C.NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 21. M. YALLAM, W/O. GATTAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 22. K. VENKATRATNAMMA, W/O. MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 23. TALARI CHALLAPPA, S/O. GATTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 24. B. SEETHAMMA, W/O. BODAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 25. B. YALLAM, W/O. LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 26. S. SEETHAMMA, W/O. VENKATA RAMANA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 27. P. SHAKUNTALAMMA, W/O. SAMPANGI RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 28. C.VENKATAPPA, S/O. GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 29. C. VENKATESH, S/O. GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 30. K.DHANLAKSHMAMMA, W/O. LATE CHANGALRAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 31. A.NARAYANAMMA, W/O. LATE CHANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS ALL PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENT OF GANDARAJUPALLE VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3 HDR,J C.C.No.1328 of 2018 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DR MANMOHAN SINGH, IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND ACQUISITION), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI K PRADYUMNA, IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SRI USHA RANI IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND ACQUISITION) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 4. SRI NARAYANA BHARAT GUPTA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT. RR 3 AND 4 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.10/12/2019. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2019 IN CC NO.1328 OF 2018. 5. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND ACQUISITION) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 6. SRI HARI NARAYANA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. RR 5 AND 6 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.23/02/2023. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2023. IN CC NO.1328 OF 2018 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for their willful, wanton and deliberate violation of the order dated 08-11-2017 in W.P.No.9067 of 2017 and pass such order or Honble Court may deem fit and proper in circumstances of the case. orders as this the facts and IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be 4 HDR,J C.C.No.1328 of 2018 pleased to implead the proposed respondents as respondents 3 & 4 in the instant contempt case and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the apperance of the petitioner herein/Respondent No.4 in the Contempt Case No.1328/2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed respondents as respondents 5 and 6 in the instant contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) 2. C SUMON 3. The Court made the following: 5 HDR,J C.C.No.1328 of 2018 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1328 of 2018 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 08.11.2017 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9067 of 2017. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the orders dated 08.11.2017 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9067 of 2017 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. In view of the above, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt: 05.11.2025 sj 6 HDR,J C.C.No.1328 of 2018 59 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1328 of 2018 Dt: 05.11.2025 sj