Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56391 (CHH)

JAGDEV PRASAD VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3728/2025 · 2025-12-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:59626-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3728 of 2025 Jagdev Prasad Verma S/o Late Bhukhan Ram Verma Aged About 59 Years R/o Near Prem Nagar Murra Bhatti, Gudhiyari, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. (Correct Name Mentioned) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station- Civil Lines, District- Raipur C.G. 2. Govind Singh Harbansh S/o Late Gofelal Harbansh Aged About 56 Years R/o Behind Shrdhanand School, Santoshi Nagar, Tikrapara, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur C.G. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 09 .12.2025 1. Heard Mr. Shobhit Koshta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.12.09 17:17:34 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR bearing FIR and Crime No. 102 of 2025 dated 01.03.2025, registered at P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur against the present petitioner for offence under Section 420, 34 of the IPC which is a gross abuse of process of law, illegal and against the provision of law and thus, liable to be quashed in the interest of justice.” 3. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 4. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the same. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all such pleas and contentions as may be available to him in law before the learned trial Court at the appropriate stage of trial. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan