Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5639 (HP)

M/s Brijeshwari Apple Agency v. Ajeet Singh

CR.R/51/2024 · 2025-08-29

Virender Singh

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2025:HHC:29480 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.51 of 2024 Date of Decision: 29.08.2025 M/s Brijeshwari Apple Agency & Anr. …Petitioners Versus Ajeet Singh …..Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Petitioners in person with Mr. Jagmohan Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Petitioner No.1-Rajesh Kumar has filed the present Criminal Revision against the judgment dated 12.01.2024, passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No.125-R/10 of 2023, titled as ‘M/s Brijeshwari Apple Agency and another versus Ajeet Singh’. 2. By way of judgment dated 12.01.2024, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, filed by the petitioners, against the judgment of conviction and order of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2025:HHC:29480 ) sentence dated 29.08.2023, passed by the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P., (hereinafter called as the ‘trial Court’), in Criminal Case No.251-3 of 2021/20, titled as ‘Ajeet Singh versus M/s Brijeshwari Apple Agency & Another.’. 3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.08.2023, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioners, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of four months and to pay a compensation of Rs.,97,000/- to the complainant. 4. After dismissal of the appeal by the learned Appellate Court, the present Criminal Revision has been preferred. 5. Now, the petitioners have moved Cr.MP No.3847 of 2025, under Section 147 of NI Act, for compounding of offence. 6. Statements of the petitioner, as well as, of the authorized representative, appearing for respondent have been recorded, in which, they have agreed that the dispute, with regard to Cheque No.881012, dated 29.09.2019 has been settled, between the parties. 3 ( 2025:HHC:29480 ) 7. Today i.e. 29.08.2025, learned counsel, appearing for respondent, under instructions, has stated, regarding the factum, as to why, respondent had filed the complaint, against the accused (petitioners), in which, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence have been passed, which have unsuccessfully been assailed, before the learned Appellate Court. He has also deposed that the matter has been settled with the petitioner. 8. The authorized representative, appearing for the respondent, has further deposed that the respondent has no objection, if the present revision petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned trial Court, are ordered to be quashed and set-aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of NI Act. 9. Today, petitioner No.1 is also present before this Court and has also stated in the aforesaid terms. He has deposed that on the basis of the compromise, the present petition may be allowed by setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, referred to above, and he may be acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of NI Act. In pursuance of the directions of this Court, 4 ( 2025:HHC:29480 ) dated 15.01.2025, he has further deposed that he has deposited a sum of Rs.29,100/- and also deposited a sum of Rs.67,900/- before this Registry, and he has no objection, in case the aforesaid amount, is released in favour of the respondent-complainant. 10. In addition to this, the petitioners have also put forward the indigent circumstances, by stating that some relaxation may be given in the compounding fee. 11. Apart from this, the petitioner-accused has also given an undertaking that he will deposit the compounding fee, within a period of six weeks from today and in case, he fails to deposit the compounding fee, within the stipulated period, the revision petition may be treated as dismissed and in that eventuality, he will surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court. 12. Considering the statements of the parties, as well as, considering the fact that the matter has been settled between the accused (petitioner) and the complainant, Cr.MP No.3847 of 2025, is allowed and the parties to the lis are permitted to compound the offence. 5 ( 2025:HHC:29480 ) 13. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.08.2023, passed by the learned trial Court, in Criminal Case No.251-3 of 2021/20, which has been affirmed by learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal No.125-R/10 of 2023, vide judgment dated 12.01.2024, are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. His personal and surety bonds are discharged. 14. However, this order shall be, subject to the deposit of 15% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee. 50% of the amount of compounding fee shall be deposited by the accused with the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, and remaining 50% of the aforesaid amount shall be deposited with the H.P. High Court, Staff Welfare Organization, Shimla, within a period of six weeks from today. 15. It is further clarified that if the petitioner fails to deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court, within a period of six weeks, then, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.08.2023, passed by learned trial Court and in that eventuality, he shall surrender before the 6 ( 2025:HHC:29480 ) learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the learned trial Court. 16. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge August 29, 2025 (subhash)