Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:61735
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 576 of 2025 1 - Prayanshu Sahu S/o Shri Lekhram Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 463, Purana Chandaniya Para, Ward No.-16, Tiwari Bal Udyan, Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ms. Divya Umesh Mishra Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.), (Contemnors) 2 - Mr. Siddharth Komal Pardeshi Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) and CONT No. 586 of 2025 1 - Sandeep Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Durga Prasad Rathore Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 16, Purana Chandniya Para Balaji Provision Store, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Ms. Divya Umesh Mishra Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mr. Siddharth Komal Pardeshi Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondents For Applicants : Mr. Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 19/12
/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the case of the applicants along with other 34 candidates is required to be considered for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher. He would further ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.19 16:27:27 +0530
2 submit that the Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPS No. 942/2025 has directed the respondents not to continue with the counseling proceeding without leave of this Court.
2. From perusal of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPS No. 942/2025, it is quite vivid that there is no bar to issue appointment order as the respondents can very well impose restrictions while issuing appointment order. Considering the fact that a lot of vacancies are available and right of other candidates will not be adversely affected in issuing the appointment order, therefore, the respondents are directed to issue appointment order for the post of Assistant Teacher in favour of the applicants along with other 34 candidates within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order by imposing following conditions:- (i) The appointment of the candidates will be subject to final outcome of WPS No. 942/2025 and in pursuance of the appointment order, they will not claim equity. (ii) The respondents are at liberty to cancel their appointment and terminate them from service, if their appointment is found illegal or contrary to the rules or instructions issued by the State Government.
3. With the aforesaid directions, both the contempt petitions are disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun