Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56383 (KAR)

SAGAR P KABADI v. MR. RUPAL M KATHARE

WP/32018/2024 · 2025-07-22

Lalitha Kanneganti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.32018/2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN 1 . SAGAR P KABADI S/O MR. PREETHAM GOVIND KABADI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT -37, 12TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, KENGERI UPANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 060 …PETITIONER/S (BY SRI./SMT.: KAPIL DIXIT, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . MR. RUPAL M KATHARE D/O MOHAN S. KATHARE AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT- NO. 16, 6TH MAIN, 14TH CROSS, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE 560 003 …RESPONDENT/S THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE HON’BLE III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE TO EXPEDITE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS IN MC NO.2753/2023, IN ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. W.P.NO.32018/2024 2 CORAM: HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI) One week time is granted to comply with the office objections. By that time, if the office objections are not complied with, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : SG COMPARED BY : SG COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR