APHC010388322016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32845/2016 Between: 1. SMT. & SRI. PATAN HUSSAIN KHAN MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REG. NO. 280/1992, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, DR. P.Y.A KHAN, 4/1462/18, PATAN COLLEGE CAMPUS, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SECRETARIAT ROAD, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD-04. 2. ICICI BANK REP BY ITS MANAGER, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. M/S CIPLA LTD, REGD. OFFICE CIPLA HOUSE, PENINSULA BUSINESS PARK, GANPATRAO KADAM MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI - 400023 R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 29-9-16 IN WPMP 41706 OF 16 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not taking redressing the grievance of the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unjust and consequently direct the Respondent No-1 to take action against the respondent No. 2 for withholding the cheque of the petitioner illegally and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 40643 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions directing the respondents to return the cheque bearing No. 545353 dated 11-07-2016 drawn on ICICI Bank Ltd, Mumbai to the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petitioner and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 41706 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead Cipla Ltd., Mumbai as party respondent No. 3 in the Writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C M R VELU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G V S GANESH 2. P SRI HARSHA REDDY 3. The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 07.10.2025 KAS 163 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32845/2016 Date: 07.10.2025 KAS