DHANNA @ DINESH S/O SHRI BHARAT LAL BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/170/2025 · 2025-03-28
Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5638 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5638 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14281-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 170/2025 Dhanna @ Dinesh S/o Shri Bharat Lal Bairwa, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Parita Road Wajirpur, Police Station Wajirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Serving Sentence In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) Through His Brother -Ravi Kumar S/o Shri Bharat Lal Bairwa, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Parita Road Wajirpur, Police Station Wajirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur.
2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through The District Magistrate, Gangapur City (Raj.).
3. The Superintendent, Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Manvendra Singh, Dy.G.A. Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 28/03/2025
1. Accused-petitioner has filed this Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) seeking first regular parole for a period of 20 days.
2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that parole application of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the Superintendent of Police, Gangapurcity has given an adverse report against the petitioner and District Probation and Social Welfare Officer has also not recommended his case. It is further
[2025:RJ-JP:14281-DB] (2 of 3) [CRLW-170/2025] contended that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than 6 years. As per the report of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bharatpur, the petitioner’s jail conduct is satisfactory for the last four years. Thus, there is no justification in rejecting his parole application.
3. Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the writ petition.
4. We have considered the contentions advanced by counsel for the parties and perused the material came on record.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than 6 years and the report of Superintendent, Central Jail, Bharatpur wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioner’s jail conduct is satisfactory for the last four years, we deem it proper to allow the present writ petition (parole), set aside the order/recommendations dated 14.08.2024 qua the petitioner and release the petitioner on first regular parole of 20 days in accordance with Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958.
6. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly allowed. The
order/recommendation of the Parole Advisory Committee dated 14.08.2024 qua the present petitioner is quashed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on first regular parole for a period of 20 days on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bharatpur with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself before the Jail Authorities on the expiry of the 20 days’ parole period and shall maintain peace and
[2025:RJ-JP:14281-DB] (3 of 3) [CRLW-170/2025] tranquility during the parole period. The 20 days’ parole period shall be counted from the date of the petitioner’s release.
7. In case the petitioner fails to surrender by stipulated date/time, the Jail Authorities shall be free to proceed against him in accordance with law.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bharatpur by fax today itself for necessary compliance.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Ritu/avinash/32