Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5637 (RAJ)

DIGAMBAR DAYAL SON OF SHRI OM PRAKASH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1818/2025 · 2025-02-04

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1818/2025 Digambar Dayal Son Of Shri Om Prakash, aged about 31 years, R/o New City, Near Shri Sant Kabir Ashram, Kishangarh Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Commissioner, Land Settlement Department, Viman Bhawan, Gopalbari, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Land Settlement Officer, GAD Quarter No.11 to 18, Pushkar byepass Road, Ajmer (Raj.) 4. Commissioner, Excise Department, Aabkari Bhawan-2, Gumaniyawala, Panchwati, Udaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Meena for Ms. Manju Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 04/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was selected as a candidate in RAS examination for the year 2021 and thereafter posted in the Excise Department, Rajasthan at Bhilwara. It is further submitted that petitioners’ salary is withheld due to non-submission of certain documents. Furthermore, being aggrieved of the said inaction of the respondents petitioner has filed a representation (Annexure-11) before the respondents No.2 and 3 however the same is not adjudicated by the respondents till date. Heard. Issue notices. (2 of 2) [CW-1818/2025] On direction of the Court, notices are accepted by Mr. Shri Ram Meena appearing for Ms. Manju Joshi, AGC On behalf of the respondent-State. This Court with the consent of respective sides disposing off the present petition howsoever with a direction that representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-11) be adjudicated by the concerned respondents, within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /329