1 / 3 2025:CGHC:58544 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5087 of 2025 Gopal Prasad Pal S/o Late Vishal Pal Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Podipa, Ward No. 6 Achankpur Nagar Panchayat Bodri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 3 - Nagar Panchayat Bodri, Through The Chief Municipal Officer, Bodri, District Bilaspur C.G. 4 - Smt. Bharti Yadav D/o Shri Laxmi Narayan Yadav Ward No. 6 Nagar Panchayat Bodri, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.12.03 14:53:20 +0530 2 / 3 02/12/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Direct the respondent no.2 & 3 to consider and decide the representation moved by the petitioner in accordance with Law within stipulated period. 10.3 Grant any other relief(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no.4 has raised unauthorized construction encroaching road within territorial jurisdiction of Nagar Panchayat Bodri, however, petitioner has not submitted any application/complaint in this regard before respondent No.3. 3. At this state, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to submit fresh representation before respondent No.3 and direction be issued to respondent No.3 to consider and take decision on representation of petitioner within specified time. 4. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit fresh 3 / 3 representation before respondent No.3 raising all such grievance as raised in this writ petition and in the event petitioner submits representation, respondent No.3 shall consider and take decision on representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, within an outer limit of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen