Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56368 (AP)

SRI KOTHAPALLYU KASULU v. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT & ANR

CMA/314/2012 · 2025-11-12

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010409392012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2012 Between: 1. SRI KOTHAPALLYU KASULU, S/O.DURGALU, HINDU R/O.VEDURAPARTHI VILLAGE, KASIMKOTA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT ANR, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS O/O.VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER O/O.KASIMKOTA [V] & [M], VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersthe record from the AP Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad may be called for in OA No.1676/2010 and examine the same and set aside the impugned award dated 22.11.2011 which was served on the appellant on IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 632 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the operation/execution of the impugned award dated 22.11.2011 which was served on in OA No.1676/2010 [Old OA No.52/2007 of DC., Visakhapatnam] passed by the AP Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1802 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inteirm stay dt. 20/04/2012 passed in CMA.MP.no. 632 of 2012 in CMA.No. 314 of 2012 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. RAYAPROLU SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS 2. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS 3. V T M PRASAD The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication and the civil miscellaneous appeal has become infrucutous. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.11.2025 TVN 220 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2012 Dated: 13.11.2025 TVN