APHC010250482014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 30273/2014 Between: 1. SHAIK JILANI BASHA,, S/O IMAM SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, R/O GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER A N D 1. APSWREIS REP BY SECY HYD ANOTHER, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY (APSWREIS), REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, SPSR, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.A1 /Tenders / 66 / 2014, dated 13 .9.2014, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 37198 of 2013 dated 14.3.2014, set-aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to re-fund the security and EMD deposit amounts to a tune of Rs.3.56 lakhs, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 37843 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order in Rc.No.A1 / Tenders / 66/ 2014, dated 13.9.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent, pending the above writ petition and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANITHA MESA (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC) 2. N BHUPAL REDDY The Court made the following: 3 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the order of 2nd respondent in Rc.No.A1/Tenders/66/2014, dated 13.09.2014, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and violation of orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.37198 of 2013, dated 14.03.2014 and set-aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to refund the security and EMD deposit amounts to a tune of Rs.3.56 lakhs. 2. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Jagadish, learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that no orders are required to be passed in the present Writ Petition, as the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. ___ __________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 13th November, 2025. DNB