APHC010625962016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17739/2016 Between: 1. RAHUL YOUTH ASSOCIATION,, REGD. NO.287/2004, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT D.RAJESH, S/O PRASAD, HINDU, AGED 35 YEARS, SERVICE PROVIDER, R/O D.NO.16/361-4, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AYUSH, CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN AURVEDIC SCIENCES, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL AYURVEDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR VECTOR BORNE DISEASES, CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN AURVEDIC SCIENCES, NEW DELHI. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL AYURVEDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR VECTOR BORNE DISEASES, CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN AURVEDIC SCIENCES, NEW RAJIV NAGAR, PAYAKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things and deeds of Respondents in rejecting further extension of service contract of Petitioner Association by proceedings in F.No.2-56(b)/2015- NARIVBDNJA/292 dated:30-05-2016 for supply of out sourcing staff in 3'd Respondent Institute for a period of one more year as per the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement dated 01-07-2015 executed in between the Petitioner and 3rd Respondent which is 'illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against to the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents to extend the services of the 2 Petitioner Association in 311 Respondent Institute for one more year i.e., upto 01-07-2017 and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 21808 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 3rd Respondent forthwith to extend the service contract of Petitioner Association in 3rd Respondent Institute for one more year i.e., upto 01-07-2017 pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 147312 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y V ANIL KUMAR (Central Government Counsel) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 8th October, 2025 cbn 4 211 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.17739 of 2016 8th October, 2025 cbn