Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5635 (RAJ)

MRS. MANJU AGARWAL W/O SHRI VISHNU KUMAR AGARWAL v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

CW/2642/2025 · 2025-02-18

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7099] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2642/2025 Mrs. Manju Agarwal W/o Shri Vishnu Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 66 Years, R/o A.r.g. B Block, Near Railway Station, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2643/2025 Vishnu Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri T.k. Agarwal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o A.r.g. B Block, Near Railway Station, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2644/2025 Vishnu Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri T.k. Agarwal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o A.r.g. B Block, Near Railway Station, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2645/2025 Vishnu Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri T.k. Agarwal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o A.r.g. B Block, Near Railway Station, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JP:7099] (2 of 2) [CW-2642/2025] 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 18/02/2025 1. Counsel for petitioners, on instructions of petitioners, submits that grievance of petitioners in respect of non-refund of Court fee, has been satisfied out of Court, therefore, the writ petitions have rendered infructuous, hence petitioners do not want to press these petitions. 2. In view of above, the present writ petitions are dismissed as not press. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/5-8