APHC010574342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29869/2023 Between: 1. JAVVAJI RANGAIAH, S/O KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , ROMPICHERLA POLICE STATION, ROMPICHERLA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. JAVAJJI VENKATA RAMANAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. JAVAJJI VENKATESWARLU, S/O KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 7. JAVAJJI SANKAR, S/O VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 8. NAVEEN, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 9. KOTA SUBBA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN SC AND ST VIGILENCE AND MONITORING MEMBER, PALNADU DISTRICT, R/O D.NO.4-97, BACK SIDE OF MPP SCHOOL, ELLAMANDA VILALGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action the 4th respondent in interfering with the civil disputes at the instance of the respondents 5 to 9 and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the property to an extent of Ac 1-25 cents in D.No.19/1, Gogulapadu village, Rompicherla mandal, Palnadu district without considering the Civil Cases as well as Writ Petition in W.P.No.21498/2022 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes for settlement and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the property to an extent of Ac 1-25 cents in D.No.19/ 1 of Gogulapadu village, Rompicherla mandal, Palnadu district at the instance of the respondents 5 to 9 herien pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29869 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action the 4th respondent in interfering with the civil disputes at the instance of the respondents 5 to 9 and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the property to an extent of Ac 1-25 cents in D.No.19/1, Gogulapadu village, Rompicherla mandal, Palnadu district without considering the Civil Cases as well as Writ Petition in W.P.No.21498/2022 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes for settlement and to pass such.…” 2. Heard Sri G.V.S. Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that based on the complaint lodged by respondent No.4, a case in Cr.No.212 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, r/w 34 of IPC was registered against the petitioner and others. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law relating to the crime which has been registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29869 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 109