SRI. SAMPANGAPPA v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
WP/20682/2025 · 2025-10-14
K S Hemalekha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56336 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56336 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40799 WP No. 20682 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 20682 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SAMPANGAPPA SO LATE MUNIYELLAPPA AGED BOUT 56 YEARS
2.
SRI CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
BOTH R/AT KODIHALLI VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 560 067. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJENDRA M S.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, BANGALORE-CHENNAI EXPRESS HIGHWAY PIU-BENGALURU, SY.NO 13, 14TH KM. NAGASANDRA BANGALORE-560 073 BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40799 WP No. 20682 of 2025
BANGALORE-CHENNAI EXPRESS HIGHWAY NO.25, NEERUBHAVI, KEMPANNA LAYOUT, HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560 024
3.
SMT. SHANTHAMMA WIFE OF LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
4.
SRI BYRESH S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE R/AT THINDLU VILLAGE JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 560 067. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ORDER DATED 25.04.2025 PASSED IN CASE NO.LAQ/NH- 207/HOSKOTE//CR/9(11)/THINDLU/21/2020-21 VIDE ANNEXURE-A BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40799 WP No. 20682 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
On 15.09.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:
"Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non prosecution. In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuing days of the respective matters being given."
2. Office objections have not yet been complied.
3. In view of the above, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32