HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 700 of 2025 Naved ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 1233 of 2023, under Sections 107, 342, 366A, 368, 376(3), 506, 120B IPC, Section 3(a)/4, 13/14/16/17, 19/21 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Casetes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 66B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station Manglore, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail. 2 4. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 28.04.2025 Ravi Bisht