Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE H
276
KARAMVIR
STATE OF HA
CORAM: HON
Present : Non
Mr.
MANISHA BAT
The fact that the matt none had appeare
It ap petition any more
14.02.2025 Jyoti-IV
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M Date of de
Ver F HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, D.A.G., Haryana.
**** A BATRA, J. (oral) There is no representation on beha e matter has been passed over twice. E ppeared on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner is not i y more. Hence, the same is dismissed
(M
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/N Whether reportable : Yes/N
AB AND HARYANA RH M No.28769 OF 2024 e of decision: 14.02.2025
…. Petitioner Versus
…. Respondents MANISHA BATRA
behalf of the petitioner despite the ice. Even on the last date of hearing s not interested to pursue the present issed for want of prosecution.
(MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE es/No. es/No e the aring esent Jyoti 2025.02.15 12:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh