HARIRAM ARYA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/16637/2025 · 2025-05-12
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56300 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56300 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78385 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 16637 of 2025 Applicant :- Hariram Arya And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri B.S. Kushwaha, learned AGA for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that a complaint stood lodged by the opposite party No. 2 against the applicants being No. 5970 of 2018 on 19.07.2018 under Sections 406 IPC read with Section 6(3)(3ka) of D.P. Act, 1961. Learned counsel for the applicant has invited attention towards Annexure-6 at page 37 and onwards reference whereof has been made at para 12 of the application that the parties have entered into compromise on 11.04.2025 out of the Court. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that direction be issued for verification and in the meantime protection be accorded.
3. Learned AGA, on the other hand, submits that once as per the applicants, compromise application has already been preferred then the direction be issued for verification of the same.
4. Considering the said submission, the application stands
disposed of directing the applicants to appear before the court below on 30.05.2025 along with the self attested copy of the present application, certified copy of the order passed today and the original compromise application. On the receipt of the same, the court below shall make endeavour to put to notice the other party and thereafter verify the compromise application within a period of two months.
5. Till the verification is done in the compromise application so submitted by the parties, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 5970 of 2018, Shankar Lal Vs. Hariram Arya and others, Under Section 406 I.P.C. and Section 6(3) (3Ka) of D.P. Act, Police Station
Kotwali, District Pilibhit, pending in the court Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit. The protection accorded to the applicants is only available subject to compliance of the terms and conditions and timeline as provided herein and in case of default, the order shall stand vacated without reference to the Bench. The parties are free to take legal recourse post outcome of the compromise.
Order Date :- 13.5.2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad