Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56296 (PNJ)

MADHURI MISHRA ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/13482/2025 · 2025-05-12

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Sr. No.: 162 Civil Writ Petition No.13482 of 2025 Date of Decision: May 12, 2025 Madhuri Mishra & another ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN PRESENT: - Ms. Preeti Manderna, Advocate, for the petitioners (through V.C.). Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana alongwith Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana. SUDHIR SINGH, J (Oral) By way of present writ petition, the petitioner have sought for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to execute the recovery certificate (Annexure P-2) dated 07.04.2023 issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram vide order dated 19.08.2021 for recovery of ` 77,09,524 from respondent Nos.3 and 4; further, to direct the official respondents to execute the aforesaid recovery certificate in a time bound manner and submit the report. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case they are given the liberty to make a fresh representation/application and competent authority is directed to deal with their concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said application/representation in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana alongwith Mr. Gaurav Bansal, AVIN KUMAR 2025.05.22 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order. CWP No.13482 of 2025 [2] Deputy Advocate General, Haryana appears and submits that the said application/representation, if so filed, shall be considered and looked into by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 (competent authority), to look into the application/representation filed by the petitioners and take an appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of such an application/representation. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sudhir Singh) Judge (Alok Jain) Judge May 12, 2025 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2025.05.22 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.