Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56296 (CHH)

M/S KORBA SERVICE STATION RETAIL OUTLET INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED v. SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LIMITED

WPC/1559/2025 · 2025-12-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61693 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1559 of 2025 1 - M/s Korba Service Station Retail Outlet Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through Its Proprietor Debjani Majumdar S/o Prafull Kumar Setthi, Aged About 37 Years, M/o Late Smt. Shanti Patel, R/o Vaishali Nagar, Kushmunda, Post Kushmunda, District Korba Chhattisgarh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Biswajeet Seet S/o Late Shri K.B. Seet, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Thekedar Mohalla (Kusmunda), Ward No. 62, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coal Fields Limited Through C.M.D. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited, Vasant Vihar, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Managing Director S.E.C.L. Kusmunda Area, Kusmunda, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Regional Personnel Manager S.E.C.L. Kusmunda Area, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Estate Officer S.E.C.L. Kusmunda Area, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Area Finance Manager S.E.C.L. Kusmunda Area, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 6 - Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Vip Road, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent No.1 to 5 : Mr. R.R. Sinha, Advocate For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.18 13:32:55 +0530 2 17/12/2025 1. Heard on application for withdrawal of writ petition. 2. Pleadings made in the application and the submission of learned counsel for petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for respondents. 3. On due consideration of the submission and the pleadings made in the application, application for withdrawal of writ petition is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, if any, exigency arises in future. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram