Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56293 (AP)

Sudhakar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9005/2021 · 2025-10-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010157502021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9005/2021 Between: 1. SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. LATE JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. D. NO. 21-60-A, NO.74, THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, CHITTOOR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. A SREENIVASULU, S/O. LATE A. CHANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RETD. AS SUPERINTENDENT IN SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, R/O. 74-THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, H/O. T. CHAVATAPALLE POST, CHITTOOR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SMT PADMA, W/O. A. SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. 74-THIMMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, H/O. T. CHAVATAPALLE POST, CHITTOOR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not providing the police protection on the complaint lodged by the petitioner ont3,..nt 2021 to enable the petitioner to use the road for agricultural activities in respect of Sy Nos. 478/2, 477A/1, 449E, 479/1A, 449D, 4491/2, Sy.No. 448/1 an extent of Ac. 0.90 cents, Ac. 0.81 cents, A.0.64 cents, Ac. 0.64 cents, Ac. 0.50 cents, Ac. 1.75 cents and Ac. 2.18 cents total an extent of Ac.7.42 cents situated at 74- Thimmasamudram Village, Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to grant police protection to the life of the petitioner and his agricultural properties situated in Sy Nos. 478/2, 477N1, 449E, 479/1A, 449D, 4491/2, Sy.No. 448/1 an extent of Ac. 0.90 cents, Ac. 0.81 cents, A.0.64 cents, Ac. 0.64 cents, Ac. 0.50 cents, Ac. 1.75 cents and Ac. 2.18 cents total an extent of Ac.7.42 cents situated at 74- Thimmasamudram Village, Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor District.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous, since the suit which was filed in O.S.No.8 of 2021 was dismissed. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 06.10.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9005 of 2021 Dt..06.10.2025 ASR