Sri Padmavathi Gardens, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10228/2021 · 2025-04-30
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56291 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56291 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT Tj^HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10228 OF 2021 Between: Sri Padmavathi Gardens, having situated at Door. No. 3-99, Konijerla Village, Gampalagudem Mandal, Krishna District, rep. by its Proprietor Sri N. H. K. Prasad, S/o. Narayana, R/o. Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 1. The Commissioner- Gram Panchayats, Tadepalli, Guntur. 2. The Konijerla Gram Panchayat, Rep. by its Secretary, Konijerla Village, Gampalagudem Mandal, Krishna District. 3. The District Panchayat Officer, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4. The Extension Officer, Mandal Prajaparishad, Gampalagudem. 5. ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent herein in issuing the impugned notice dated 12.05.2021 as arbitrary, illegal and set- aside the same and consequently direct the respondents herein not to demolish the function hall in the name and style “Sri Padmavathi Gardens” situated in land admeasuring Acres 2-04 Cents in R.S. Nos. 45/3A and 45/3B respectively within the limits of Konijerla Village and Gram Panchayat, Gampalagudem Mandal, Krishna District. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to issuance of the impugned notice dated 12.05.2021 by the 3rd respondent herein including the demolition of function hall in the name and style "Sri Padmavathi Gardens situated in land admeasuring Acres 2-04 Cents in R.S. Nos. 45/3A and 45/3B respectively within the limits of Konijerla Village and Gram Panchayat, Gampalagudem Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition / II Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. G. Urmila, Represented for SRI.
S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following Order:
r-r™’ 1 APHC010187542021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10228/2021 Between:
1.SR1 PADMAVATHI GARDENS,, HAVING SITUATED AT DOOR. NO. 3- 99, KONIJERLA VILLAGE, GAMPALAGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI N. H. K. PRASAD, S/0. NARAYANA, R/0. HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE COMMISSIONER GRAM PANCHAYATS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR. 3.THE KONIJERLA GRAM PANCHAYAT, , REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, GAMPALAGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA KONIJERLA VILLAGE, DISTRICT. 4.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5.THE EXTENSION OFFICER, GAMPALAGUDEM. MANDAL PRAJAPARISHAD, ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SSRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): TYarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja
-b. ' ,*# 2 Parishads.Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 2.GPF0RPANCHAYATRAJ RURAL DEV 3.N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: Ms. G. Urmila, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S. Sridhar,
learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner would submit that the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has filed a Letter in the Registry on 29,04.2025 along with the Letter from the Writ Petitioner dated 18.03.2025, seeking to withdraw this Writ Petition. Both the Letters are taken on record.
2. Request granted.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
Sd/- K.KASI RAd ACH^ assistant registrar a //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, \
1. One CC to SRI. S SRIDHAR Advocate [OPUC] GP for PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV ,High Court Of
2. Two CCs to Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Three CD Copies vna
HIGH COURT DATED;01/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.10228of 2021 2«SEP 2025 ^ . Current beciion m: 60 e> DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS