1 2025:CGHC:60907 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6509 of 2025 1 - Rupendra Kumar Jaiswal S/o Late Salik Ram Jaiswal Aged About 59 Years 2 - Vijay Kumar Jaiswal S/o Late Salik Ram Jaiswal Aged About 69 Years Both are R/o Village Sarwani, Tahsil Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 492002 2 - Secretary Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Collector District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kharsia Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 6 – Tahsildar, Tahsil Kharsia, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Nayab Tahsildar, Tahsil Kharsia, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Savitri Devi W/o Ramlal Agrawal, R/o Dabhra Road Kharsia, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Prakant Sethi, Advocate For State/Respondents : Ms. Upasna Mehta, Dy.Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.16 11:21:01 +0530 2 15/12/2025 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners may be granted liberty to file an appeal against the order passed by the Tahsildar before the Sub-Divisional Officer (R). 2. Learned State counsel submits that she is having no objection on the prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners. 3. On due consideration on the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioners to file appeal in accordance with law. If any appeal is filed by petitioners, the appellate authority shall consider and take decision on the interim application to be submitted along with appeal keeping in mind the last date of procurement of paddy fixed by the State Government under the paddy procurement policy. 4. Registry is directed to returned back all the certified copies of the documents annexed along with writ petition to learned counsel for petitioners after retaining photocopy of the same. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram