Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56277 (BOM)

EKNATH GANPAT MALKAPURE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR YAVATMAL AND 3 OTHERS

CAF/3821/2025 · 2025-10-17

Shri Pravin S Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 caf.3821.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3821 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 816 OF 2014 Eknath Ganpat Malkapure ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Raunak Kurani, Advocate h/f Shri Amol B. Patil, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 and 4. Shri K.S. Narwade, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATED : 17/10/2025. By this application, the respondent nos. 3 and 4 seeks extension of time to deposit the amount. 2. Learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 states that cheque of Rs.38,19,297/- is ready. However due to some unavoidable reasons, same was not deposited in the registry of this Court. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, time is extended and respondent nos. 3 and 4 are permitted to deposit the cheque during diwali vacation, in office working days. 4. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAVIN S. PATIL , J. ) Trupti