Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
1199 Pankaj State of Punjab
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
of respondents No.6 to 17 made pursuant to the 28.03.2008, Annexure P of time, especially in wake of there being no interim order.
2.
unable to establish contact with the petitioner.
3.
revived by demonstrating that the
16.05.2025 parveen kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Versus f Punjab and Others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate for Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Sarvjeet Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 5. Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate for respondents No.8, 13 to 15, 17, 18 and 20.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the selection of respondents No.6 to 17 made pursuant to the 28.03.2008, Annexure P-1, might not even be surviv of time, especially in wake of there being no interim order.
Learned counsel states that despite best efforts, he is also unable to establish contact with the petitioner.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7205-2009 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.05.2025
....Petitioner
...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate and
Mr. Sarvjeet Singh Thakur, Advocate,
Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate for
respondents No.8, 13 to 15, 17, 18 and 20. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the selection of respondents No.6 to 17 made pursuant to the advertisement dated 1, might not even be surviving due to the efflux of time, especially in wake of there being no interim order.
Learned counsel states that despite best efforts, he is also unable to establish contact with the petitioner.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.16 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.