1 2025:CGHC:56313 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2556 of 2025 1. Sandeep Patel S/o Phul Singh Patel Aged About 38 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director, Office Of Joint Director, Town And Country Planning, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Alok Chandra Baiswade S/o Dharmesh Chandra Baiswade Aged About 34 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director, Town And Country Planning Ambikapur, District Suguja (C.G.) 3. Kritika Sinha W/o Dr. B.K. Sinha Aged About 34 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director (Survey), Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Tameshwar Dewangan S/o Ramkishan Dewangan Aged About 31 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director, Town And Country Planning Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5. Shobhit Ekka S/o Hermon Ekka Aged About 29 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director, Town And Country Plainning Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) 6. Lalita Dhurve W/o Kuleshwar Prasad Mandavi Aged About 34 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director, Office Of Joint Director, Town And Country Planning, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. Chandrashekhar Jagat S/o Late Ram Singh Jagat Aged About 33 Years At Present Posted And Working As Assistant Director, New Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Housing And Environment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)] SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.11.20 10:56:22 +0530 2 2. Director Town And Country Planning, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 19/11/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No. 7 of 2025 for withdrawal of the petition. 2. On due consideration, the same is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted in favour of the petitioner to challenge the DPC or promotion in the planning Wing if it has taken place. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh