Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56270 (AP)

Sk. Subhani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21123/2019 · 2025-10-14

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010438522019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 21123/2019 Between: 1. SK. SUBHANI,, S/O. GALIB, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. F.P. SHOP DEALER, F.P.SHOP.NO. 0734002, R/O. D.NO.1-112, OPP. MAZID, MAIN ROAD, CHEBROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR CS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in suspending the authorization of the petitioner vide Rc.No.1189/2019-S5 dated 13.12.2019 basing on the report U/Sec.6(A) of the EC Act, 1955 is illegal, arbitrary, and violation of the principles IA NO: 1 OF 2019 2 VS,J W.P.No.21123 of 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings vide Rc.No.1189/2019-S5 dated 13.12.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent by permitting the petitioner to supply the Essential Commodities from the petitioner's Fair Price Shop No.0734002 of Chebrolu Village and Mandal, Guntur District by supplying the Essential Commodities, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.21123 of 2019 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that, in view of the subsequent developments, no further cause survives in the present writ petition. Therefore, requested this Court to close the writ petition. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 15.10.2025 KGR