Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56269 (CHH)

GHASIRAM PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8427/2025 · 2025-08-20

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42533 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8427 of 2025 1 - Ghasiram Prajapati S/o Rajaram Prajapati Aged About 60 Years R/o Rawanbhata Para, Pithora, Police Station And Tehsil- Pithora, District - Mahasamund C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund C.G. 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pithora, District Mahasamund C.G. 4 - Tahsildar Pithora, Tehsil- Pithora, District Mahasamund C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 21/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties would jointly submit that the petitioner is now reinstated after revocation of his suspension vide order dated 14.08.2025. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.22 12:28:06 +0530 2 2. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present petition may be disposed of directing the petitioner to make his representation with respect to the decision of his suspension period to the authorities concerned and in such eventuality the authorities concerned may be directed to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law with respect to the claim of suspension period. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of reserving the liberty to the petitioner to move his representation to the authorities concerned with respect to his claim of his suspension period and if such representation is being made by the petitioner, the authorities concerned is directed to take a decision within 90 days from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, on its own merits keeping in view the relevant rules and circulars governing the field. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved