Smt Glory Priyadarshini, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/9082/2021 · 2025-12-30
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56267 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56267 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010157282021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9082/2021 Between:
1. SMT GLORY PRIYADARSHINI,, W/O LATE T. BALA OBANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D. NO. 26- 573/3, S. P. G. COMPOUND, KURNOOL, NANAYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDAYALA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
5. NEELIMA JESSY, D/O DASARI SUMITHRA, W/O LATE DASARI VIJAYA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 15MONTHS, REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, RESIDING AT H.NO. 26-207-B-34 GNANAPURAM NANDYALA TOWN, KRUNOOL DISTRICT A.P. 518501.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in adding the 5th respondent ie Neelima Jessy as family Member of Late Bala Obanna along with the petitioner and her minor children as being illegal arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and against Articles 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and set aside the family member certificate issued by the 4th respondent vide proceedings R. C. No. 419/2020 dated 17-02-2021 and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondent to consider the representation dated 23-02-2021 sent by the petitioner through register post forthwith and direct them to take action by directing the 4th respondent to issue fresh Family Member Certificate in the name of the petitioner and her two children without the name of the 5th respondent ie Neelima Jessy as family member in the interest of Justice, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings vide R. C. No. 419/2020 dated 17-02- 2021 issued by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order granted on 27 .04.2021 in I.A.No .1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 9082 of 2021. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2.
SODUM ANVESHA
3
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondent. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in adding the 5th respondent as family member of late Bala Obanna along with the petitioner and her minor children. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondent on 23.12.2025 submitted the G.O.Ms.No.145 dated 25.04.2015 and its amended G.O. vide G.O.Ms.No.584 dated 11.12.2023. Then, the learned counsel for the petitioner took time to get instructions from the petitioner on 23.12.2025 and today when the matter is taken up for hearing, he submits that the petitioner may be given an opportunity to work out her remedies as per the above said G.Os. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, an opportunity is given to the petitioner to work out her remedies as per the above said G.O.Ms.No.145 dated 25.04.2015 and its amended G.O.Ms.No.584 dated
11.12.2023. In case, if the petitioner approaches the 2nd respondent in terms of G.O.Ms.No.584 dated 11.12.2023, by way of making an application along with the supporting documents in support of her claim, the same shall be
disposed of as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with law, by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and the 5th
4
respondent and upon verification of the records, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits.
5. For the above said purpose, the petitioner shall make her application before the said authority within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of the said application, the same shall be
disposed of as directed above by the said respondent within a period of three (03) months thereafter.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
31.12.2025 PGT