114 BARURAM EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. petitioner affiliation of the School on 05.03.2024, copy of which has been appended as Annexure petitioner 2. Annexure P been issued 2), which is incorrect as no order causing prejudice could have been issued before deciding the application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI CWP-13412 Date of Decision : 12 BARURAM EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate with Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate and Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioner-School is that the petitioner-School had applied for permanent affiliation of the School on 05.03.2024, copy of which has been appended as Annexure 2 but no decision has been taken, which is causing prejudice to the petitioner-School. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that notices Annexure P-3 dated 11.04.2025 and Annexure P been issued without deciding the application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P which is incorrect as no order causing prejudice could have been issued before deciding the application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 13412-2025 Date of Decision : 12-05-2025 BARURAM EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate with Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate and Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the School had applied for permanent affiliation of the School on 05.03.2024, copy of which has been appended as 2 but no decision has been taken, which is causing prejudice to the Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that notices 3 dated 11.04.2025 and Annexure P-4 dated 01.05.2025 have the application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P which is incorrect as no order causing prejudice could have been issued before deciding the application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) hence, ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the School had applied for permanent affiliation of the School on 05.03.2024, copy of which has been appended as 2 but no decision has been taken, which is causing prejudice to the Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that notices 4 dated 01.05.2025 have the application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P- which is incorrect as no order causing prejudice could have been issued 2) hence, the SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.12 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13412-2025 -2- respondents be directed to decide the said application in a time bound manner by passing an appropriate speaking order. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, any application dated 05.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration qua the permanent affiliation being prayed for by the School concerned, if not already decided, the same will be decided within a period of 30 days from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. 12-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.12 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document