APHC010642362022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 38336/2022 Between: 1. CHINTADA GIRINAADH, S/O.SURYA PRAKASARAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, CHAIRMAN, OM SRI GAYATRYVISWAKARMA UNIVERSITY, EDUGUNDLAPADU, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P., ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADDIPADU POLICE STATION, MADDIPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE MEMBER SECRETARY AND CEO, ANDHRA PRADESH, HIGHER EDUCATION REGULATORY MONITORING COMMISSION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Or Certiorarised Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent in registering FIR No. 266/2022 dt.08.11.2022 of its police station on the basis of 4th respondent complaint dt.07.09.2022 as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14,19 and 21 the Constitution of India and consequently Quash the FIR and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to FIR No.266/2022 of 3rd Respondent Police Station, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PITCHAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. VIVEKANANDA VIRUPAKSHA 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner, seeking the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ or order more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Or Certiorarised Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent in registering FIR No.266/2022 dt.08.11.2022 of its police station on the basis of 4th respondent complaint dt.07.09.2022 as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14,19 and 21 the Constitution of India and consequently Quash the FIR and grant ...” At the time of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the Petitioner (Ch.Girinadh) is no more. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing for respondent State is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 38336 of 2022 05.11.2025 Mjl /*