Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5625 (UTT)

HARI BISHWAS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/525/2025 · 2025-05-15

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3998 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc Application No. 525 of 2025 15 May, 2025 Hari Bishwas --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondent ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Deep Prakash Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Ajay Joshi and Mr. Amit Kapri, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. This criminal misc. application is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. by the petitioner/accused with prayer to quash Charge-sheet No.87/2023 dated 21.11.2023 and summoning order dated 14.12.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No.1521/2023, “State Vs. Hari” P.S. Jhankiya, District Udham Singh Nagar along with entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No.33/2023, “State Vs. Hari” under Sections 307, 504 IPC, pending before the learned Additional Session Judge, Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. In view of the fact that a Compounding 1 2025:UHC:3998 Application was filed by the parties before this Court, this Court vide order dated 25.04.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, DLSA, District Udham Singh Nagar in order to get their statements recorded and to verify the compromise deed. 3. Pursuant to such order, the Secretary, DLSA, District Udham Singh Nagar has submitted his report dated 07.05.2025 which clearly indicates that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and have also verified the contents of the compromise. 4. In view of the above, Compounding Application (IA No.2 of 2025) is allowed. As a consequence thereof, the entire entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No.33/2023, “State Vs. Hari” under Sections 307, 504 IPC, pending before the learned Additional Session Judge, Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar is hereby quashed qua the petitioner in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Present petition u/s 528 of B.N.S.S. is, thus, disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 15.05.2025 SS 2