Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56247 (AP)

JASWINDAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/8845/2024 · 2025-11-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010549722024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8845/2024 Between: 1. JASWINDAR SINGH, S/O.JOGENDRA SINGH, HINDU, AGED 37 YEARS R/O.H.NO.1/70-71, VIKASPURI, WEST DELHI,DELHI ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.27/2024 on the file of the Court of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada City, Krishna District arising out of Cr.No.246/2024 of Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada City, Krishna District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. HABIBULLA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioner/A.3, seeking to quash the Proceedings against him in PRC No.27 OF 2024 on the file of the Court of VI Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent/State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner herein is arrayed as A.3, he is falsely implicated in this case and he is innocent of the offence. Learned counsel would submit that except bald and omnibus allegations, no specific overt acts are attributed against him. At this juncture, learned counsel restricted the prayer and sought for a direction to dispense with the presence of the Petitioner before the trial Court and the Criminal Petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioners to raise such contentions before the trial Court in defence. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to raise the present contentions before the trial 3 Court in his defence. However, the presence of the Petitioner/A.3 before the trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court with regard to the subject matter. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No. 8845 of 2024 21.11.2025 Mjl /*