1 APHC010283352024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14211/2024 Between: 1. SIDDAMMAGARI HANUMANTHA REDDY, S/O SANJEEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE, PAAMIDI MANDALM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTAKAL DIVISION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAAMIDI POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. BADVELU AADI NARAYAN REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE, PAAMIDI MANDALM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. BADVELU VENU GOPAL REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE, PAAMIDI MANDALM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 7. G SREENADH REDDY, S/O NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE, PAAMIDI MANDALM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 8. G YASWANTH REDDY, S/O NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE, PAAMIDI MANDALM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents No. 2 to 4 in not taking any action against respondents No. 5 to 8 in respect of representation/complaint dated 13-06-2024 made by the petitioner for registration of a complaint is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India consequently pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to take necessary and legal action against the 5th to 8th respondent by way of registering a complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 13-06-2024, pending disposal of the above writ petition .” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14211 of 2024 Dt..22.11.2025 ASR