CRWP-4822 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 110 Pawan Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and also to decide the representation dated 06.05.2025 submitted by him. 2. learned State counsel that thorough inquiry has been conducted on the representation submitted by the petitioner but he could not produce any evidence or material to support his allegations before S. Barnala. In fact, four cases have been registered against the petitioner himself and he has filed the present 3. submit anything 4. present petition and the same is disposed. 4822-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Pawan Kumar Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Robin Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and also to decide the representation dated 06.05.2025 submitted by him. Reply has been filed by the respondent learned State counsel that thorough inquiry has been conducted on the representation submitted by the petitioner but he could not produce any evidence or material to support his allegations before S. Barnala. In fact, four cases have been registered against the petitioner himself and he has filed the present petition to obstruct the ongoing trial against him. Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner could not submit anything supporting the claim of the petitioner. In view of the above, no further orders are called for in the present petition and the same is disposed. - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4822-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.08.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and also to decide the representation dated 06.05.2025 submitted by him. has been filed by the respondent-State. It is argued by learned State counsel that thorough inquiry has been conducted on the representation submitted by the petitioner but he could not produce any evidence or material to support his allegations before S.P. (Detective), Barnala. In fact, four cases have been registered against the petitioner himself to obstruct the ongoing trial against him. Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner could not supporting the claim of the petitioner. further orders are called for in the -1- 2025 (O&M) 07.08.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and also to decide the representation dated 06.05.2025 submitted by him. State. It is argued by learned State counsel that thorough inquiry has been conducted on the representation submitted by the petitioner but he could not produce any P. (Detective), Barnala. In fact, four cases have been registered against the petitioner himself to obstruct the ongoing trial against him. Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner could not further orders are called for in the MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4822 5. submitted his explanation and request for exempting his personal appearance before this Court. The same is accepted. However, he is directed to be cautious and prompt in future. 07.08.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 4822-2025 (O&M) In compliance with order dated 01.08.2025, respondent No. 2 has submitted his explanation and request for exempting his personal appearance before this Court. The same is accepted. However, he is directed to be cautious and prompt in future. 07.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - In compliance with order dated 01.08.2025, respondent No. 2 has submitted his explanation and request for exempting his personal appearance before this Court. The same is accepted. However, he is directed to be (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- In compliance with order dated 01.08.2025, respondent No. 2 has submitted his explanation and request for exempting his personal appearance before this Court. The same is accepted. However, he is directed to be MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document