Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56242 (AP)

SHAIK MAHABUB SUBHANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/30390/2025 · 2025-11-03

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010585742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30390/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK MAHABUB SUBHANI, S/O SHAIK IBRAHIM SUBHANI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O UPPUTURU VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BAPATLA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PARCHUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order bearing Rc.No,154/2025- B, dated 2.5.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent-RDO suspending the petitioners authorization in u respect of F.P.Shop No.0821041, situated in Upputuru Village, Bapatia Mandal and District as illegal, violation of Principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of 2 VS,J W.P.No.30390 of 2025 India and contrary to the provisions of Control Order, 2018 and set-aside the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to continue the petitioner as F.P.Shop Dealer for the above shop and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to continue the petitioner as F.P.Shop Dealer for F.P.Shop No.0821041, situated in Upputuru Village, Bapatla Mandal and District by suspending the order bearing Rc.No.154/2025-B, dated 2.5.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent-RDO, pending disposal of the writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.30390 of 2025 ORDER: When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated 04.11.2025 KGR