IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7561 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Bhupinder Singh & another …….Petitioners Versus The Managing Director Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited. … Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Proxy Counsel vice Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Proxy Counsel vice Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners case is squarely covered by the judgment dated 3.8.2023, passed in CWP No. 2004 of 2017, titled Taj Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh and as such, they would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P- 3) having been filed by the petitioners in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate vice Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, while putting appearance on behalf of the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondent, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks in light of Taj Mohammad case (supra). Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if they still remain aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 08, 2025 (shankar)