2025:CGHC:30403 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 374 of 2025 1 - Anwesha Sarkar D/o Shambhu Sarkar Aged About 36 Years Post Physiotherapist R/o. House No. 2/120, Byron Bazar, Near Aashirwad Bhavan, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Madhuri Paikera W/o Umashankar Paikera Aged About 34 Years Post Physiotherapist, R/o. Sadaram Para, Padkidih, Baloda Bazar District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Shubhra Dubey W/o Pankaj Dubey Aged About 41 Years Post Physiotherapist, R/o. Near Shree Tiles Behind Raza Complex Pachpedi Naka, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Dr. Shipra Sharma Medical Superintendent Cum Academic Incharge Dks Pgi And Research Center, Amrit Sandesh Complex, Ghadi Chowk, Great Eastern Rd, Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002 2 - Dr. Hemant Sharma Deputy Medical Superintendent And Registrar, Dks Pgi And Research Center, Amrit Sandesh Complex, Ghadi Chowk, Great Eastern Rd, Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002 3 - Dr. V. Dayal Plastic Surgeon Hod Physiotheray And Rehabilitation Department Dks Pgi And Research Center, Amrit Sandesh Complex, Ghadi Chowk, Great Eastern Rd, Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002 ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners : Shri Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate For Respondents/Contemnors : Ms Akanksha Jain, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 03.07.2025 1. Pursuant to order dated 19.06.2025, respondents/contemnors are present in person before this Court. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.04 17:13:49 +0530 Cont 374 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order under contempt was complied with. She also produced a copy of the order dated 30.06.2025, which is being taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, and would submit that in view of compliance of the order under contempt, petitioner does not want to continue present petition, and the same may be disposed of. 4. On due consideration of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, present petition stands disposed of, and the contempt proceedings are closed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma